I realize I haven't written much (anything) about Sophie's adventures in middle school. She's been off now to one of our public school district's "focus" programs since early September, and the best news, of course, is that she loves it. It's a small 6-8 program with about 75 students, none of whom are allowed access to their cell phones during the day. This is especially good for rare children like Sophie, who do not own cell phones.
But I found a post this morning over on Camp Creek Blog that inspired me to tell a little story. Lori posted:
From our first years in the educational system, society has ways of discouraging the expansive, questing mode of attention that’s essential to creativity and personal rebirth. In one poignant indication of what happens when young children learn to switch off active focusing and just go through the motions, second-graders from different schools were given a problem to solve: “There are twenty-six sheep and ten goats on a ship. How old is the captain?” Nearly 90 percent of students from traditional classrooms answered “Thirty-six”. Not one pointed out that the problem didn’t make sense, compared to almost a third of the kids from less conventional, more mindful classrooms. — Rapt: Attention and the Focused Life, Winifred Gallagher
Earlier this week, Sophie was working on a routine homework assignment called a "writing focus". In her literature study at school, she's been assigned to read My Brother Sam is Dead along with a whole group of other kids. [If you haven't already, now would be a good time to click "Nancy Atwell Speaks Up" under the Smart and Good sidebar to hear everything that is already wrong with this picture... but I digress.] In order to do the writing focus, Sophie and her classmates have to answer a litany of questions organized around some kind of paragraph structure. These are the kind of questions that send the kids back to the text searching, searching for whether the blanket Sam had wrapped around him after battle was green or brown. And occasionally requiring them to cite text to prove it. When they return to class, they exchange papers, read each other's answers, and mark them right or wrong. If ever there is any ambiguity-- like whether townspeople would be more upset over the British stealing cows or guns, the teacher decides, and if you're on her side, you're right. (I'm not sure if she is required to cite text.)
Okay, and so now some of you I'm sure, are wondering how I can possibly stand idly by and let Sophie spend her time this way. When I did get a chance at Back to School NIght to ask her teacher some questions about this process, she explained it all. "Children this age aren't capable of thinking beyond literal questions about text." And because I stopped breathing at that point, it became more important for me to walk to my car than to try and engage in any further conversation. Sophie will eventually be done with this literature group, and I do want to be around when it's over.
Hang on, there's a bright spot coming.
This week, I happened to be helping her type up one of her last assignments for this book. I noticed that one of the questions she was supposed to answer began with, "Do you think..". My heart sang. But when she started flipping pages in the book, I was confused. And when she found the answer, as black and white as ever, I was crushed. And angry. But if I have learned anything over these first six weeks of adventures in regular public school, it is composure. So I said, "You know, Sophie, that question isn't really fair. It starts off, 'do you think' but it still has an answer that is right or wrong. Any question that asks you what you think should never be a set up for being wrong." (I couldn't help myself here...) "Your teacher has made a mistake." Sophie agreed, and we moved on. A few questions later she told me, "Here, look, this one really is a thinking question. 'Do you think that it was realistic for Sam to have hope in light of his situation?'" Here is her response:
I think it's realistic for Sam to hope to be freed. It's always good to have some hope, even though you know the truth may be otherwise. In a way, the hope can keep him alive while he still is. When you lose hope, you lose everything. Nobody has the power to take away your hope if you can keep it inside you.
And, um, she's right. Of course.
I asked her later what had happened in class when they'd gotten to that first "thinking" question. Did the problem with the question come up? And you know what? It did. The teacher apologized for her mistake.
After 8 years in a school that focused on wiring children's brains to be fully alert and alive in an "expansive, questing mode of attention", I don't think there's any going back for Sophie. In the meantime, she'll learn to cite text in perfect form, have plenty of space left over in her brain to learn to navigate the expectations of this new environment, focus on building new relationships, and get a lot of typing practice.
At some point last year, she let me know that she "hated to talk about books!" And so best of all for me, maybe, is that after a few weeks of this she told me that, "it really is more interesting and fun to have a conversation about what you think about a book, than to answer questions your teacher already knows the answer to." And she's getting a chance to discover this for herself.
Of course, this whole story does nothing to help the situation in our schools that is so clearly bent towards the issues Lori's post describes. Except to make me ever more committed to keep sharing what seems to be working. So it goes.